Welcome at the blog and enjoy all posts!
Moreover, when you become a member of this community, you can attribute in discussion forum and share your own pictures in the memberblog. See also:
Register | Log in
New polls online! Have you voted yet?
Daily updates of boys around the world are provided to you by members of the community. Visit their posts and comment.
To the member blog *daily updates*
Wanna share your pictures too?
Become a member!
pet on leash
I’m sorry, but I do not like this post, what kind of a person refers to a boy as on the leash? That is so sad…
alexavanhelsing it just photos from net what i found. i dont know who he is and why leash.
I definitely agree with your sentiment… although I suspect nalle2 meant it in more of an observatory way – I sense a bit of language barrier that may leave the meaning of “leash” lost on him… perhaps. I’m inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.. he referred to his own brother as a ‘pet’ so… that may cut both ways though – either he’s really terrible or it may be an even stronger showing that the connotation it has in English is lost on him…
i can speak english well. i just post that boy because he is cute. he use leash too or harness, i dont know why. i did not post this because i like when boys are on leash
Well, the way you write is indicative of a non-native English speaker. I’m not trying to attack you or be critical of you – so I hope you don’t take it that way – I’m just pointing something out which may account for the differing interpretations of what you said.
grrr… stupid thing…
back to the point. He meant it as a joke. It looks like a climbing harness to me. So I guess he is having fun and acting foolish.
i am from finland and it just photos. Cute boy on his leash so can we talk about him and not about me. English is not my language, Finland is. But talk about boy on leash, please
Stupid thing was refering to the server that made me post 3 lettres…
He meant it as a joke: about the title.
It looks like a climbing harness to me. So I guess he is having fun and acting foolish. -> about the boy.
it no climbing harness, it child leash and child harness
Its a climbing harness. You’re really starting to get on my nerves dude. This boy is AMERICAN. We don’t do that to our boys here.
In all likelihood, one of his parents probably works for Collier County, Florida public utilities, and his parent is, I guess, showing him what their job is – which may involve repairing power lines or other objects which are high up and would require the use of a safety harness.
i know who this is. i google that image. he is 9 year old boy and he have autism and that is child harness
Really??? You said before that you did *not* know who he is. Now you claim to know who he is just so you can get other people to believe that this is a child harness when it is clearly NOT. The kind of children’s harnesses that you apparently fantasize about do not have the peripheral straps with metal rings nor do they have straps that run between the legs – those features are found on SAFETY harnesses. What the hell is your deal!?
google this image and admit you are wrong. i did. he is 9 and he have autism. his name is sam. google image
I did google the image – nothing of the sort came up. Post a link.
I thought so. You really have lost all credibility in my eyes. I am extremely doubtful that the the boy you claim to be your brother in fact is your brother. I think he’s not, and you certainly don’t have him “trained like a dog.”
Problem is: I know kids harnesses. (the leashes) They are way thiner.
With the extra amount of play in the belts this suggests it is for an adult. Since those straps are rated for at least 1000lbs each it is clear this is a safety harness for hights, same as the legstrap. It isn’t for recreational climbing since those are others. MinterGreen’s idea seems most logical. It is probably for working on hights. Only one problem with MinterGreens logic: “This boy is AMERICAN. We don’t do that to our boys here.” Sorry, but the USA is no better than any other country, probably worse than a lot of others.
About keeping kids on “leashes” like this? Not sure where you’re from but I’ve never seen the kind of treatment suggested by Nalle2 here – anywhere in the U.S. What you must mean is that NO country does that to their boys… except in Nalle2’s fantasies that is..
it his mom facebook, i found this, here is proof who that boy is
i am very sad that i come here and you people call me liar. always people hate me
Well – it looks like you were right. I’ll admit it. That photo with him in the mirrors is pretty convincing evidence on how that mom is using it. It still seems inappropriately bulky and restraining but perhaps the mom already had that and didn’t want to buy one made for that purpose. I apologize for suggesting you are a liar and I hope you will forgive me. I am convinced as to this imagine that you were right.
i forgive you. you thinks it wrong that boy use leash?
Ordinarily yes. But if his mom does it for his safety (not merely convenience) then I suppose it is understandable.
Btw, Jo, I hope you did not think that I buy into American exceptionalism – because I do not. But I am still proud of my country for a lot of the things it stands for (but not all) and am happy to live here.
here in finland it not any child leash, i dont see them. do minter know why some kids use leash, i wanna know if you know
It is not common in western culture as far as I know. It may be used by a few people who think their usually much younger kids are too prone to wandering off and getting lost. Most people do not use them – probably because it is seen as somewhat degrading and not socially acceptable. It is more understandable to be used with a child with diminished mental capacity. Otherwise – verbal communication should suffice.
I figure that the description of boy on a leash is no mistake but a fix by the original speaker. The word ‘leash’ is not available except as a control device. It is NOT a word for workers any way any where I have been able to figure ( lead and angle and pull and more words …. not leash ). ‘ LEASH ‘ is exclusive for animals and humans for control of the animal / human. Except as a word for a control of the thing ‘ on the leash ‘, the word ‘ LEASH ‘ has no relationship. NO! Not to any tunnel work, rock climbing, cave struggling, mine making, as examples. If you like a some one on a leash you have control. that is one thing. Lie and ‘ desiccate ‘ word-wise, well, then, that is what you do. ME BE NO FOOL. CHILD LEASH is legal USA depending on the situation. Otherwise, it is an old ( 1920, the oldest I see the name for boys ) boy control device. It is also an ancient girl control device but I fail to see the word except as I write it. PLEASE DO NOT FUCK WITH ME. UH-OH …
Heel. Good boy.
There was an episode on Modern Family while they were visiting Disney Land and the character who plays Lily was put on a leash because she had a habit of wandering off.
If the intent is for safety of the child then I guess it is excusable.
For any other reason….INEXCUSABLE
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
For more information about the blog you can always contact us.
➞ Click here